Evidentsiaalsuse ja episteemilise modaalsuse suhetest eesti lastekeeles käitumiskatsete põhjal
Abstract
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.16
Evidentsiaalsuse ja episteemilise modaalsuse sarnasused ja erinevused on viimasel aastakümnendil olnud mitme uuringu aluseks. Eesti vat-morfeemi (ole-vat) kohta on arvatud, et see keeleüksus võib kanda kaht tähendust: nii evidentsiaalset kui ka episteemilis-modaalset. Uurisime selles artiklis, kuivõrd tõlgendati vat-morfeemi episteemilise modaalina. Täpsemalt selgitasime eesti laste käitumiskatsetega, mis on evidentsiaalide olemuses sellist, et nad on seotud episteemilise modaalsusega. Katsetest selgus, et evidentsiaalse markerina omandatakse vat-morfeem enne üheksandat eluaastat. Episteemilise modaalina tõlgendamine üheksandaks eluaastaks vaid kasvab, seega omandatakse eesti vat-morfeemi tähendustest kõigepealt evidentsiaalsus ja alles siis episteemiline modaalsus.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan 1988. The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554353
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan 2013. Evidential and generic issues of social cognitive developmental linguistics. [Projektitaotluse tekst.] Istanbul: Bosphorus University.
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan; Slobin, Dan I. 1986. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. – Wallace Chafe, Johanna Nichols (Eds.). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Hillsdale: Ablex, 159–167.
Argus, Reili; Kapanen, Airi; Kütt, Andra; Parm, Sirli; Suurmäe, Kadri; Tamm, Anne 2013. Evidentsiaalidel on täiskasvanute ja laste seas erinev funktsioon. – Ettekanne konverentsil “Teoreetiline keeleteadus Eestis”, Tartu, 16.–17. detsember 2013.
Argus, Reili; Suurmäe, Kadri; Kütt, Andra; Tamm, Anne 2014. Eesti kaudse evidentsiaalsuse morfoloogilise markeri omandamisest: mõistmiskatse tulemused. [The acquisition of the morphological marker of evidentiality in Estonian: The results of a comprehension experiment.] – Krista Kerge (Toim.). Uurimusi keele omandamisest, õppimisest ja korpustest. Tallinna Ülikooli eesti keele ja kultuuri instituudi toimetised 16. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus, 83–102.
Butler, Lucas P.; Markman, Ellen M. 2012. Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. – Child Development, 83 (4), 1416–1428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01775.x
Choi, Soonja 1995. The development of epistemic sentence-ending modal forms and functions in Korean children. – Joan Bybee, Susanne Fleischman (Eds.). Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Typological Studies in Language 32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 165–204.
Clark, Eve 2004. How language acquisition builds on cognitive development. – Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (10), 472–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.012
Csibra, Gergely; György, Gergely 2011. Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 366, 1149–1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0319
de Haan, Ferdinand 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. – Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 83–101.
de Haan, Ferdinand 2005. Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. – Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges, David S. Rood (Eds.). Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories. Studies in Language Companion Series 72. Amsterdam: Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.18haa
de Villiers, Jill; Garfield, Jay; Gernet-Girard, Harper; Roeper, Tom; Speas, Margaret 2009. Evidentials in Tibetan: Acquisition, semantics, and cognitive development. – Stanka A. Fitneva, Tomoko Matsui (Eds.). Evidentiality: A Window into Language and Cognitive Development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 125. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 29–47.
EKG I = Erelt, Mati; Kasik, Reet; Metslang, Helle; Rajandi, Henno; Ross, Kristiina; Saari, Henn; Tael, Kaja; Vare, Silvi 1995. Eesti Keele Grammatika I. Morfoloogia. Sõnamoodustus. [Estonian Grammar I. Morphology. Word-formation.] Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut.
Erelt, Mati 2002. Evidentiality in Estonian and some other languages. Introductory remarks. – Linguistica Uralica, 38 (2), 91–97.
Erelt, Mati 2013. Eesti keele lauseõpetus. Sissejuhatus. Öeldis. [Estonian Syntax. Introduction.] Tartu ülikooli eesti keele osakonna preprindid 4. Tartu. http://hdl.handle.net/10062/34069
Erelt, Mati; Metslang, Helle; Pajusalu, Karl 2006. Tense and evidentiality in Estonian. – Bert Cornillie, Nicole Delbecque (Eds.). Topics in Subjectification and Modalization. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 125–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bjl.20.09ere
Fitneva, Stanka A. 2001. Epistemic marking and reliability judgments: Evidence from Bulgarian. – Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (3), 401–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00010-2
Gelman, Susan A. 2010. Generics as a window onto young children’s concepts. – F. J. Pelletier (Ed.). Kinds, Things, and Stuff: The Cognitive Side of Generics and Mass Terms. New Directions in Cognitive Science 12. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kehayov, Petar 2004. Eesti keele evidentsiaalsussüsteem mõne teise keele taustal. Morfosüntaks ja distributsioon. [The Estonian evidential system in contrast with some other grammatical evidential systems. Morphosyntax and distribution.] – Keel ja Kirjandus, 11, 812–829.
Kehayov, Petar 2008. An Areal-Typological Perspective to Evidentiality: The Cases of Balkan and Baltic Linguistic Areas. Dissertationes linguisticae Universitatis Tartuensis 10. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Kütt, Andra; Tamm, Anne; Argus, Reili 2014. Evidentsiaalsus ja kognitiivne dissonants: ühe esmase katse tulemused. [Evidentiality and cognitive dissonance.] – Oma Keel, 1, 51–58.
Metslang, Helle; Pajusalu, Karl 2002. Evidentiality in South Estonian. – Linguistica Uralica, 38 (2), 98–109.
Palmer, Frank Robert 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, Frank Robert 1996. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Papafragou, Anna; Li, Peggy; Choi, Youngon; Han, Chung-hye 2007. Evidentiality in language and cognition. – Cognition, 103 (2), 253–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.001
Postimees. http://www.postimees.ee/.
Premack, David; Woodruff, Guy 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? – Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1 (4), 515–526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Rett, Jessica; Hyams, Nina; Winans, Lauren 2013. The Effects of Syntax on the Acquisition of Evidentiality. BUCLD 37 Proceedings. Cascadilla Press.
Rätsep, Huno 1971. Kas kaudne kõneviis on kõneviis? Verbivormide situatsioonianalüüsi. [Is the oblique mood a mood?] – Keel ja struktuur 5. Töid strukturaalse ja matemaatilise lingvistika alalt. Tartu Riiklik Ülikool, eesti keele kateeder. Tartu, 43–67.
Sepper, Maria-Maren 2005. Vahendatuse morfosüntaktiline väljendamine eesti kirjakeeles 19. sajandi lõpust 20. sajandi lõpuni. [Indirect evidentiality in Estonian journalistic and fiction texts of the late 19th and the 20th centuries.] Magistritöö. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikool.
Slobin, Dan; Aksu, Ayhan 1982. Tense, aspect and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. – Paul J. Hopper (Ed.). Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics. Typological Studies in Language 1. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publications, 185–200.
Stephany, Ursula 1993. Modality in first language acquisition: The state of the art. – Norbert Dittmar, Astrid Reich (Eds.). Modality in Language Acquisition. Sociolinguistics and Language Contact 6. Berlin–New York: De Gruyter, 133–144.
Zufferey, Sandrine 2010. Lexical Pragmatics and Theory of Mind: The Acquisition of Connectives. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.201
Tamm, Anne 2008. Partitive morphosemantics across Estonian grammatical categories, and case variation with equi and raising. – Miriam Butt, Tracy Holloway King (Eds.). Proceedings of the LFG08 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 473–493. http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/LFG/13/papers/lfg08tamm.pdf (1.10.2014).
Tamm, Anne 2009. The Estonian partitive evidential. Some notes on the semantic parallels between the aspect and evidential categories. – Lotte Hogeweg, Helen de Hoop, Andrei Malchukov (Eds.). Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality. Linguistics Today 148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 365–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.148.15tam
Tamm, Anne 2011a. Cross-categorial spatial case in the Finnic non-finitive system: Focus on the absentive TAM semantics and pragmatics of the Estonian inessive m-formative and non-finites. – Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 49 (4), 835–944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.025
Tamm, Anne 2011b. The case of Nincstelenek (‘the Destitue’): Nounless and verbless in the Uralic grammar. – Sándor Csúcs, Nóra Falk, Viktória Tóth, Cábor Zaicz (Eds.). Proceedings of Congressus XI Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum: Piliscsaba, Hungary, August 9–14, 2010. Piliscsaba: Reguly Társaság, 270–276.
Tamm, Anne 2014. The partive concept versus linguistic partitives: From abstract concepts to evidentiality in the Uralic languages. – Silvia Luraghi, Tuomas Huumo (Eds.). Partitive Cases and Related Categories. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 89–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110346060.89
Tamm, Anne; Argus, Reili; Suurmäe, Kadri 2014. Evidentsiaalid: kas uskuda või mitte? Teabe vormi mõju eesti koolieelikute käitumisele. [Evidential sentences guiding Estonian preschoolers’ exploration of novel objects and their properties.] – Emakeele Seltsi aastaraamat, 59 (2013), 244–261. http://dx.doi.org/10.3176/esa59.13
Öztürk, Özge; Papafragou, Anna 2007. Children’s Acquisition of Evidentiality. – BUCLD 31 Proceedings Supplement. http://papafragou.psych.udel.edu/papers/BU-Ozge.pdf (1.10.2014).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.16
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2015 Anne Tamm, Reili Argus, Airi Kapanen, Andra Kütt, Kadri Suurmäe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1736-2563 (print)
ISSN 2228-0677 (online)
DOI 10.5128/ERYa.1736-2563