Dynamic assessment of word derivational knowledge: Tracing the development of a learner

Dmitri Leontjev

Abstract


The present paper reports on a case study that explored the applicability of dynamic assessment (DA) for promoting learners’ word derivational knowledge in English as a second or a foreign language (L2). One learner’s performance on tasks assessing his word derivational knowledge was measured four times. The first two measurements were conducted before and after three weekly human-mediated DA sessions and the last two, which took place a year and a half later, before and after three weekly computerised DA sessions. Think aloud protocols and interviews were used to trace changes in the learner’s use of strategies and knowledge sources. The results revealed that following the dynamic assessment, the learner improved his performance and used strategies and knowledge sources more successfully. The findings have implications for designing dynamic tests of L2 English word derivational knowledge and for word derivational knowledge instruction.

Sõnatuletuse oskuste dünaamiline hindamine: ühe õpilase arengu jälgimine


Uurimuse eesmärk on süvendada arusaamist sellest, kuidas dünaamiline hindamine võimaldab arendada õppija sõnatuletusoskusi. Õppija sõnatuletusteadmiste arengut võrreldi enne ja pärast hindaja- ja arvutipõhist dünaamilist hindamist. Uurimus keskendub õppija strateegiate ja teadmiste allikate kasutusele. Peamiste uurimisvahenditena rakendati valjusti mõtlemise protokolle ja intervjuud. Õppija arengudünaamika jälgimiseks oli hindaja ja arvutipõhise hindamise vahel pooleteistaastane paus. Analüüs osutas, et õppija mitte ainult ei hakanud rakendama hindamise käigus kasutatud strateegiaid, vaid muutus keeleloomes ka üldiselt edukamaks. Seega aitas dünaamiline hindamine süvendada õppija sõnatuletusteadmisi ja arendada strateegiapädevust. 


Keywords


L2 learning, sociocultural theory, mediation, inferencing strategies, knowledge sources, self-regulation, English

Full Text:

PDF

References


ATLAS.ti. Version 5.0. [Computer software] 2004. Berlin: Scientific Software Development.

Bauer, Laurie; Nation, I.S. Paul 1993. Word families. – International Journal of Lexicography, 6 (4), 253–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijl/6.4.253

Bowles, Melissa A. 2010. The Think-Aloud Controversy in Second Language Research. Routledge.

Council of Europe 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. [Electronic version.] http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_en.pdf (30.6.2015).

Dörnyei, Zoltán 2005. The psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Friedline, Benjamin E. 2011. Challenges in the Second Language Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: From Theory to Practice. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.

Kozulin, Alex; Garb, Erica 2002. Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. – School Psychology International, 23 (1), 112–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733

Leontjev, Dmitri 2014. The Effect of Automated Adaptive Corrective Feedback: L2 English questions. – APPLES: Journal of applied language studies, 8 (2), 43–66. http://apples.jyu.fi/article/abstract/301 (30.6.2015).

Leontjev, Dmitri (in press). L2 English Derivational Knowledge: Which Affixes Are Learners More Likely to Recognise? – Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching.

Leontjev, Dmitri; Huhta, Ari; Mäntylä, Katja (revised and resubmitted). Word derivational knowledge and writing proficiency: How do they link?

Mäntylä, Katja; Huhta, Ari 2013. Knowledge of word parts. – J. Milton, T. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Dimensions of Vocabulary Knowledge. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 45–59.

Nakayama, Natsue 2008. Effects of Vocabulary Learning Using Affix: Special Focus on Prefix. http://www.kyoai.ac.jp/college/ronshuu/no-08/nakayama.pdf (30.6.2015).

Nassaji, Hossein 2003. L2 vocabulary learning from context: Strategies, knowledge sources, and their relationship with success in L2 lexical inferencing. – TESOL Quarterly, 37 (4), 645–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588216

Nation, I. S. Paul 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759

O’Malley, Michael J.; Chamot, Anna U. 1990. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490

Oxford, Rebecca L. 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.

Poehner, Matthew E. 2008. Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development. Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9

Poehner, Matthew E.; Lantolf, James P. 2013. Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). – Language Teaching Research, 17 (3), 323–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935

Põhikooli riiklik õppekava õigusakt (2010); Lisa 2. [Basic School National Curriculum Act: Annex 2.]. Pub. L. No. RT I 2010, 6, 22. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/aktilisa/1281/2201/0017/13275423.pdf (2.7.2015).

Rose, Heath 2012. Reconceptualizing strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bathwater. – Applied Linguistics, 33 (1), 92–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr045

Schmitt, Norbert; Meara, Paul 1997. Researching vocabulary through a word knowledge framework. – Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 (1), 17–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001022

Swain, Merrill 1998. Focus on form through conscious reflection. – C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 64–81.

Teo, Adeline 2012. Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. – Language Learning & Technology, 3, 10–20. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2012/action.pdf (20.9.2014).

Tseng, Wen-Ta; Dörnyei, Zoltán; Schmitt, Norbert 2006. A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. – Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 78–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046

Tulving, Endel; Kroll, Neal 1995. Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. – Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2 (3), 387–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210977

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa12.09

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Dmitri Leontjev

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

ISSN 1736-2563 (print)
ISSN 2228-0677 (online)
DOI 10.5128/ERYa.1736-2563